Why didn't Julie (Series 3) use the Green gem as a bludgeoning tool in self defence?
Why didn't Martin (of the same series) run forward when Morghanna appeared instead of sitting there like a basking lemon?!
Daft, inconsequential subject for debate
-
- Fright Knight
- Posts: 1932
- Joined: 06 Mar 2003, 10:27
- Location: Isle of Wight
Re:Daft, inconsequential subject for debate
If the only way is onward how would you get home for tea??
-
- Level 1 Dungeoneer
- Posts: 97
- Joined: 29 Jun 2004, 23:38
- Location: Blackpool
Re:Daft, inconsequential subject for debate
Only as part of The Greater Game.Naitch wrote: Did Lord Fear and Treguard secretly enjoy playing Squash together?
They didn't do it for fun like Mario and Bowser do with their karting when Bowser isn't kidnapping the princess.
-
- Level 2 Dungeoneer
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 23 Aug 2005, 23:53
- Location: London
Re:Daft, inconsequential subject for debate
Who put the Bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp?
- BrotherStrange
- Dungeoneer
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 17 Aug 2008, 23:33
Re:Daft, inconsequential subject for debate
In one quest of Series 7, troll footsteps were used to hurry a dungeoneer up in a dwarf tunnel. How would a troll fit in a dwarf tunnel?
I hadn't realised I'd entered the lunatic asylum! No doubt one day you'll be cured, you poor creature
-
- Level 1 Dungeoneer
- Posts: 97
- Joined: 29 Jun 2004, 23:38
- Location: Blackpool
Re:Daft, inconsequential subject for debate
Very carefully.Brother Strange wrote: In one quest of Series 7, troll footsteps were used to hurry a dungeoneer up in a dwarf tunnel. How would a troll fit in a dwarf tunnel?
-
- Level 3 Dungeoneer
- Posts: 275
- Joined: 18 Jan 2003, 03:54
- Location: Deepest Glasgow
- Contact:
Re:Daft, inconsequential subject for debate
On the timed causeways, (the ones with the Frightknight) why didn't teams ever try running their Dungeoneer right up the middle? If the blocks only drop when the sword hits the dot, I'd imagine most teams could outrun it.
"Gentlemen! Please! You can fight like itsy bitsy babies later. Right now we have adult name-calling and mud-slinging to attend to."
- Dr. Nightmare, Attorney at Law
- Dr. Nightmare, Attorney at Law
- HStorm
- Fright Knight
- Posts: 2838
- Joined: 30 Nov 2003, 13:12
- Location: Salford, UK
- Contact:
Re:Daft, inconsequential subject for debate
And why does the helmet on the life force clock have a feather adorning its peak and no horns, when the HoJ has horns and no feather?
Knightmare Audio Plays from The Dunshelm Players.
-
- Level 3 Dungeoneer
- Posts: 275
- Joined: 18 Jan 2003, 03:54
- Location: Deepest Glasgow
- Contact:
Re:Daft, inconsequential subject for debate
What would have happened if the teams had refused to accept the various side-quests of S4 and didn't get the Eye-Shield? Would we have been spared all the pre-recorded sequences, or would it have been instant death?
"Gentlemen! Please! You can fight like itsy bitsy babies later. Right now we have adult name-calling and mud-slinging to attend to."
- Dr. Nightmare, Attorney at Law
- Dr. Nightmare, Attorney at Law
- HStorm
- Fright Knight
- Posts: 2838
- Joined: 30 Nov 2003, 13:12
- Location: Salford, UK
- Contact:
Re:Daft, inconsequential subject for debate
And did the branches of trees and bushes in S4 ever hit the Eye-Shield in the eye? Did it ever have to use Optrex after a quest?
Knightmare Audio Plays from The Dunshelm Players.
-
- Level 3 Dungeoneer
- Posts: 275
- Joined: 18 Jan 2003, 03:54
- Location: Deepest Glasgow
- Contact:
Re:Daft, inconsequential subject for debate
Who would ever actually employ an assassin in KM? If they can be scared off by children making loud noises then they couldn't even take someone like Gretel.
"Gentlemen! Please! You can fight like itsy bitsy babies later. Right now we have adult name-calling and mud-slinging to attend to."
- Dr. Nightmare, Attorney at Law
- Dr. Nightmare, Attorney at Law
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests