The Joys of Knightmare

Series, Teams, History, Behind the scenes etc. - all discussed here.
Post Reply

What really did make Knightmare?

he long and perilous quests
2
22%
he retro 80's graphics
1
11%
he vast range of rooms and challenges
4
44%
he Characters
1
11%
he absolutely awful hair styles
1
11%
reguards speech at the end
0
No votes
Ooh... nasty'
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 9

Raven
Level 2 Dungeoneer
Level 2 Dungeoneer
Posts: 135
Joined: 11 Jun 2004, 10:56
Location: Newcastle
Contact:

The Joys of Knightmare

Post by Raven »

I suggest you choose wisely, one of these may lead to certain death...
The Raven's Labyrinth - Where danger lurks around every corner...
Superspurs

Re:The Joys of Knightmare

Post by Superspurs »

The graphics in the 80's were rubbish. Thats pretty much the reason why i prefer S4-8 (1990-94)
I still enjoyed watching KM though even in the earlier seasons
Raven
Level 2 Dungeoneer
Level 2 Dungeoneer
Posts: 135
Joined: 11 Jun 2004, 10:56
Location: Newcastle
Contact:

Re:The Joys of Knightmare

Post by Raven »

More votes please
The Raven's Labyrinth - Where danger lurks around every corner...
Fidjit
Fright Knight
Fright Knight
Posts: 1932
Joined: 06 Mar 2003, 10:27
Location: Isle of Wight

Re:The Joys of Knightmare

Post by Fidjit »

Superspurs wrote: The graphics in the 80's were rubbish. Thats pretty much the reason why i prefer S4-8 (1990-94)
I still enjoyed watching KM though even in the earlier seasons
Well you have to admit the graphics were pretty good considering computer graphics weren't the top of things in the late 80's
If the only way is onward how would you get home for tea?? :-/
User avatar
HStorm
Fright Knight
Fright Knight
Posts: 2838
Joined: 30 Nov 2003, 13:12
Location: Salford, UK
Contact:

Re:The Joys of Knightmare

Post by HStorm »

Yes, by modern standards the graphics look pretty weak (I wouldn't say rubbish), but the early seasons were made during the era when 8-bit imaging was considered pretty nifty, so by those standards they were incredibly good.

Also, strictly speaking they weren't graphics, they were hand-paintings, and as paintings go they were remarkable. I mean, is the Mona Lisa rubbish just because it doesn't look as convincing as a photograph? Should we burn Hanz Holbein's masterpieces simply because the style he used has been outmoded by photography and CGI?

The hand-paintings don't look ideal for the purpose for which they were devloped, it's true, but even they had a strength the photographic images of S4-7 lacked, which is they could look like anything the artist could picture in his mind. Photographing reality, by contrast, is restrictive. That made the paintings seem more fantastical and magical than the environments of the photo era, and given the supernatural nature of KM, that was very valuable.
Last edited by HStorm on 18 Jun 2004, 15:38, edited 1 time in total.
Knightmare Audio Plays from The Dunshelm Players.
WillsOfDoom
Level 2 Dungeoneer
Level 2 Dungeoneer
Posts: 105
Joined: 01 Mar 2004, 21:32
Location: The Mills of Doom (AKA Cambridge)

Re:The Joys of Knightmare

Post by WillsOfDoom »

Good point, well made. I can't bring myself to tick just one of Casper's boxes though.
I like my telly scary, and very dungeonish.
Malefact
Fright Knight
Fright Knight
Posts: 1556
Joined: 19 Nov 2002, 11:59
Location: Manchester

Re:The Joys of Knightmare

Post by Malefact »

I'm going to have to be a bit of a heretic and go for my own option and say that it was tension that made Km.
Subject to change.
MoanaLiza
Fright Knight
Fright Knight
Posts: 2202
Joined: 09 Apr 2003, 22:48
Location: The Hundred Acre Wood near Winnie The Pooh :)
Contact:

Re:The Joys of Knightmare

Post by MoanaLiza »

I'd probably be inclined to agree and also it was the cliff hangers that was one reason why people tuned in each week and the excitement of thinking on the way home from school "Ooh Knightmare's on tonight, I wonder what's going to happen. Is such and such going to win?" and so on...
The Forum Moana and chief honey pot carrier!
"Come and take a gander at this bit of ugliness"
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests