did u watch how the goblin walked? lol amuseing.
it sure as hell wasn't Chris.


Just one other point: When Chris (as a goblin) was confronted by Brother Mace, the monk said that if they had something of Motley's (i.e the stick!) then Motley would be able to turn them back into a normal dungeoneer again, so Motley would have been able to turn them back to normal AND give them the password for the Blocker. Beats me how the team would have been able to get the firestone though.





Drassil wrote:I'm not comfortable with the whole idea of Chris having to return to where he entered Level 2 in order to get to Level 3. To me, it's a little too close to breaking the hallowed 'only way is onward, there is no turning back' dictum; plus, the idea of a dungeoneer having two Smirkenorff flights is something I find less than credible.


Drassil wrote:I am so perplexed by this quest. I wish I knew exactly what was 'supposed' to have happened on Level 2. Although I feel like I'm about three years late with this post, here, for what it's worth, are my thoughts.
One point that hasn't been raised in this thread is that during the spyglass scene in the previous episode, Lord Fear and Aesandre discussed a 'trap' being set. This suggests to me that the team was meant to use a spell on the frozen firestone (Treguard prompts them to ensure this happens), and that the spell was meant to turn the dungeoneer into a goblin. Thus the transformation would have occurred whichever spell they'd bought: in my opinion, CHANGE and SWITCH are largely synonymous, and the rather unclear scroll clue, 'fair trade is no robbery', referred only to the silver, because it's just too ambiguous to indicate one spell or the other. As I said in a post earlier this year: 'The whole goblin transformation 'subplot' seems too unique and detailed for it to have been merely a 50-50 possibility; and a scene where a dungeoneer enters a Level 2 room, casts SWITCH to de-ice a firestone, picks it up then walks out, seems too straightforward'.
Although the team have been criticised as dense, their only real mistake was not taking Motley's bauble, and considering that they had a vague scroll clue and four objects to choose from (Team 4, who went on to win, had only three Level 2 clue objects to choose from), it's maybe not as stupid a mistake as it may seem. Because of what happened to Chris, and the manner of his demise, the team ended up looking even more foolish than perhaps they were. That's just my opinion.
But that speculation by no means solves all the puzzles. Assuming Chris had taken the bauble, summoned Motley, been turned back and got the password, how would he then have got the firestone which Elita said he needed? Surely Motley couldn't have been expected to provide that too, simply for being summoned? And so we're left with no real idea of how the team would have completed Level 2.
I'm not comfortable with the whole idea of Chris having to return to where he entered Level 2 in order to get to Level 3. To me, it's a little too close to breaking the hallowed 'only way is onward, there is no turning back' dictum; plus, the idea of a dungeoneer having two Smirkenorff flights is something I find less than credible. What's more, it throws up a continuity error: during the Level 1 spyglass scene, Lord Fear said he wanted Chris stopped before he could reach the Gate Tower, i.e. inter-level descendor. But if he's doing all his level-to-level travelling on Smirky, he wouldn't be visiting the Gate Tower anyway. From this inconsistency, and the way that the three characters seen in Level 1 of the quest appeared/would have appeared on Level 2 (Elita, Mace, Motley), and the way that the team was required to find a clue object that had already featured in Level 1 (firestone), I suspect that the Level 2 was originally scripted for a different quest, but put into Quest 7 for some reason. It all adds to the confusion.

. I'm afraid I don't have any detailed analysis to offer, but my tuppence worth 
).
I remember it from when I was little and being suspicious of innocent looking walls for a while afterwards!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest